Showing posts with label pollution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pollution. Show all posts

Aqui está a resposta ao pedido de informações! (I)

Parte 1 - Resposta do IACM:

Relativamente à questão que colocou neste Centro, levamos ao conhecimento de V.Exa. a tradução para português, feita por este Centro, da resposta em chinês que recebemos do Instituto para os Assuntos Cívicos e Municipais em 14.06.2007:

Agradecendo, desde já, a carta enviada pelo cidadão e as opiniões preciosas apresentadas, informamos que as duas companhias de autocarro e o sector de táxi de Macau introduziram recentemente veículos ecológicos, tendo uma dessas companhias introduzido veículos híbridos que funcionam a gasolina e electricidade.

Em virtude da existência de limitações no domínio da construção de infraestruturas, manutenção e conservação de equipamentos, pessoal especializado em reparação, oficinas de reparação e postos de fornecimento de energia, a utilização de veículos a gás ou gás natural em Macau exige um período de tempo para proceder a análise. Além disso, é do nosso conhecimento que o Gabinete para o Desenvolvimento do Sector Energético está a fazer estudos sobre a utilização de gás natural para produção de energia e de veículos a gás natural.
De acordo com o Quadro IV anexo ao Regulamento das Inspecções e da Fixação de Diversas Características dos Veículos Automóveis vigente, o valor máximo admissível para a emissão de gases de escape por unidades de fumo (HSU) nos veículos a gasóleo é de 60 (sessenta).”

Centro de Atendimento e Informação ao Público

The silent killer...(II)


Beijing blames pollutants for rise in killer cancers

Jonathan Watts in Beijing
Tuesday May 22, 2007

Foul air, filthy water and contaminated soil have led to a surge of tumours in
China, where cancer is the main cause of death, the state media reported
yesterday.
Raising fears that breakneck economic growth is having a dire
impact on the nation's health, a government survey blamed pollution for a sharp
rise in cancer cases.
According to the health ministry, the disease is ahead
of cerebrovascular and heart ailments as the nation's biggest killer.

Full story here.

Sustainable solutions for a healthy planet - REDUCE

FIRST: Reduce

The critical first step of waste prevention has been overshadowed by a focus on recycling. Please help to promote a greater awareness of the importance of the "Reduce" part of the Reduce-Reuse-Recycle mantra.

To reduce is the first priority in the waste reduction heirarchy. Using less in the first place, sometimes called source reduction, is the easiest way to solve the world's mounting garbage problem. Source reduction means reducing the amount of material that enters the waste stream. It avoids disposal and pollution problems right from the start, and it conserves natural resources and energy. Reducing waste at the beginning means there will be less waste to be recycled or landfilled. Try some of these ideas at home, school or work today!

1. Simplify: Simplify your life as much as possible. Only keep belongings that you use/enjoy on a regular basis. By making the effort to reduce what you own, you will naturally purchase less/create less waste in the future.

2. Tree-Free Home: As much as possible, create a tree-free home:
*replace paper napkins with cloth napkins
*replace paper towels with a special set of cloth towels/napkins - store the used ones in a small container in your kitchen and just wash and reuse
*purchase bleach-free, toilet paper that is made from the highest post-consumer waste content you can find (80% minimum)
*if you print documents, print on once-used paper and/or bleach-free, recycled paper with the highest post-consumer waste content available (or hemp/alternative-source paper, if you can afford it)
*create and use note pads from once-used paper
*leave messages for family members/roommates on a reusable message board
*make your own cards/letters from once-used products or handmade paper

3. Reduce Purchases: In general, think before you buy any product - do you really need it? How did the production of this product impact the environment and what further impacts will there be with the disposal of the product (and associated packaging materials)? When you are thinking about buying something, try the 30-Day Rule -- wait 30 days after the first time you decide you want a product to really make your decision. This will eliminate impulse buying.

4. Bulk Purchases: Avoid products that are packaged for single use (i.e., drinks, school lunches, candy, cat and dog food, salad mixings, etc.). Instead, buy in bulk and transfer the products to your own reusable containers. Many health food stores have bulk bins where they sell everything from grains to cereal to cleaning products.
For additional ideas, read the Precycling information page.

6. Avoid Trash: Avoid creating trash wherever possible: when ordering food, avoid receiving any unnecessary plastic utensils, straws, etc. (ask in advance), buy ice cream in a cone instead of a cup, don't accept "free" promotional products, buy products with the least amount of packaging, etc. Every little bit of trash avoided does make a difference!

7. Shopping Bags: While shopping, if you only buy a few products skip the shopping bag. For larger purchases, bring your own.

8. Junk Mail: Find the way to avoid junk mail in your hometown.

9. Green Hotels: When staying at a hotel, motel, or bed and breakfast let the management know that you like to support businesses that adopt environmentally responsible practices (including reducing waste). Print out and drop off the Sustainable Solutions for Green Hotels list. To locate environmentally friendly hotels, search on the Internet under "ecotourism" and/or visit Green Hotels Association.

*Mug-to-Go: Carry a mug with you wherever you go for take out beverages.

*Protect Children: Protect your child from mindless consumption.

And more tips for REDUCING waste go to here!

Baby diapers facts

Facts for mommies and mommies-to-be:
Your baby will spend about 25,000 hours in diapers and need about 6,000 diaper changes during the first years of life. Since your baby will spend so much time in diapers, let’s take a closer look at disposable diapers. On the market since the early 60’s, the disposable diaper changed from a plastic diaper with a lot of paper fluff to a diaper constructed of a waterproof plastic outer layer, an absorbent pad with super absorbent chemicals, and an inner liner. The super absorbent chemical, sodium polyacrylate, absorbs and holds fluids in the diaper. This chemical has been linked to toxic shock syndrome, can cause allergic reactions, and is lethal to cats if inhaled. This chemical is toxic. Dioxin, the most toxic of all cancer-linked chemicals, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is a byproduct of bleaching paper. The disposables also use dyes, potencially harmful. The Food & Drug Administration (FDA) received reports that fragrances caused headaches, dizziness, and rashes. Problems may arise if plastic parts of diaper are torn by the babies and taken to the mouth or nose!

About 5 million tons of untreated body excrement, which may carry over 100 intestinal viruses, is brought to landfills via disposables. This may contribute to groundwater contamination and attract insects that carry and transmit diseases. In 1990, 18 billion disposables were thrown into United States landfills. Is it wise to use 3.4 billion gallons of oil and over 250,000 trees a year to manufacture disposables that end up in our already overburdened landfills? These disposables are not readily biodegradable. The paper must be exposed to air and sun to decompose. Thirty percent of a disposable diaper is plastic and is not compostable. Even if the rest of the diaper could be composted, these plants could only handle 400 of the 10,000 tons of diapers tossed in landfills EACH DAY, assuming they didn’t have to process any other compostable garbage. Biodegradable diapers have cornstarch added to the plastic to break it into tiny pieces. The pieces still end up in landfills.

And the good news are:
Nowadays there are several alternatives to normal disposable diapers. You may find organic diapers (biodegradable, without bleach or other chemicals that may harm the baby's skin and the environment, you may even order with amazon.com) or you may turn to old-style reusable diapers. Don't be scared right away! These diapers don't need to be tied with pins or anything. They already come in the shape of the disposable diaper, with elastics and attachable strips, and experienced mommies say it's easy to clean....

It's cool and easy on your purse, your baby's skin and spares the environment ;-)

And if you are a mommy-to-be in Macau, it will not cost you a thing to take a peek at THIS! It may sound strange at first, but the info may be useful!

Just dropped my questions in the portal of Macau Government.

Deixei as minhas questões aqui.

Bom dia,
Gostaria de indagar junto de vós se existe algum plano para a introdução de autocarros movidos a electricidade em Macau. É uma iniciativa já visível em muitas cidades do mundo e visa acompanhar o desenvolvimento sustentável das cidades e promover uma melhoria na qualidade do ar.
Gostaria igualmente de perguntar quais são as perspectivas e planos de melhoria da qualidade do ar e redução da poluição que existem para Macau, face ao aumento exacerbado do número de carros e motas em Macau.
Uma última questão, gostaria ainda de saber qual a legislação aplicável para a emissão de gases poluentes dos veículos automobilizados visto haver centenas de carros, motas e autocarros que à vista de todos emitem do tubo de escape um desagradável fumo preto, que julgo resultar de falta de vistoria e avarias e que aparentemente sobre eles não há qualquer controlo ou medidas no sentido de serem multados ou forçados a resolverem o problema.
Agradeço e aguardo a vossa resposta.

Atenciosamente,
T.F.

Ficaremos à espera da resposta!

The silent killer...

Each morning, when I leave home to work, and drive my car I think about it. It's there. We all know about it and tend to ignore it, like we do with all problems that affect us and the planet.
Air pollution is everywhere, exactly because it's the air, it is everywhere...with all the pollution in it.
So far we have been talking about the future of the planet and the future generations.
What about now? I live in such a polluted city that if I stop to think about it, it makes me feel sick that we are condemning ourselves to a pollution-related disease. Does anybody think about this?
The air in Macau is thick and grey and is getting into our lungs with every breath we take.
Even in Coloane...which seems a last resource for fresh air, is not pollution-free at all.
There is the stone grinding industry which releases stone powder dust that has already condemned to lung cancer many workers from the near-by Seac Pai Van Park, supposedly the place we go for pure and fresh air ....
Waiting in traffic jams and red lights with all those high-pollutant motorbikes and old buses blowing black smoke from the engine pipes into our faces?
So many casinos and money flowing around and we have to take all this smoke? So much money here and still no improvement in the air quality. So much money and still no electric or hydrogen buses....
Can you imagine when the bridge Macau-Hong Kong-Guangzhou is ready? How many cars and buses will there be in Macau then?
Nobody seems to care and improve the situation. It doesn't make you wealthier and that's it.
Seems hopeless. Looks like it will never get better.
And what can the normal citizen do in a place where apparently there is no law governing the release of pollutants by cars, buses and cars, because we keep seeing those vehicles releasing black smoke, which would be forbidden in other countries but here is still allowed? Why?
The government is somewhat sensitive to the power of the press. However, the press doesn't always use its powers to exert pressure. So, here is a suggestion to our fellow local journalists... and for the government ;-)
Many cities are promoting the use of electric buses and the result is less pollution and less noise too!
And for the normal citizen, like me, we can always drop our opinions and suggestions here or here. It will not take you long ;-) and the more comments we drop the better chance for our voices to be heard!
I grew up in a fairly fresh-aired small village in Portugal and had a fortunate childhood in the countryside together with trees, green places and animals. Never thought that some years later I would be deprived of it and missing it so much.
But here.... kids can't even enjoy green, pollution free places unless they fly away. . Isn't this terrible? Forcing them and us to constantly breathe the polluted air of Macau? There is no countryside in Macau. Depriving kids from enjoying a grass field, with poppies and butterflies and a blue sky? What will their future be like? Where will they be in 10 years?
Well, this is the place where I wish to be in 10 years, and hope everybody can find a place like this and finally live a healthy life:
sdfasdfasdflaskjdffasdfasdfasdfasdf
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaOdemira*Alentejo*Portugal

Autonomia Verde

GM apresenta Chevy Volt com pilha de hidrogénio

Sem emissões poluentes, a tecnologia E-Flex, que utiliza pilhas de combustível a hidrogénio no Chevrolet Volt, permite uma autonomia de 483 quilómetros.
Maior empresa mundial da indústria automóvel, a norte-americana General Motors (GM) deu um passo decisivo na procura de soluções que não dependam do petróleo, com a apresentação do Chevy Volt no Salão Automóvel da cidade chinesa de Xangai. O modelo tem incorporada uma nova geração de pilhas de combustível, que recorre à tecnologia de hidrogénio, com metade do tamanho da versão anterior.
Em comunicado, a marca norte-americana refere que a nova arquitectura de propulsão eléctrica E-Flex para aplicar em veículos automóveis, recorre a uma bateria de iões de lítio, permitindo uma propulsão sem petróleo, nem emissões poluentes, e precisando apenas de metade da quantidade de hidrogénio requerida pela anterior geração.
Os motores com tecnologia de hidrogénio não geram quaisquer emissões poluentes, libertando apenas vapor de água, pelo tubo de escape.
No caso do Chevrolet Volt, com a nova pilha de combustível pesa menos 30 por cento do que o modelo anterior e o sistema de propulsão, integrado sob o capot, equivale em tamanho a um motor convencional de quatro cilindros com transmissão automática.
O Volt pesa assim 1.588 kg, possuindo painéis moldados de plástico nos guarda-lamas, nas janelas, no painel de instrumentos e no volante, que permitiram reduzir o peso em 30 a 50 por cento por componente.
A arquitectura E-Flex da GM incorpora diferentes sistemas de propulsão do automóvel baseados na energia eléctrica, com geração de electricidade por diferentes fontes. Ou seja, com a nova geração de pilhas de combustível pode-se aumentar a autonomia em 34 quilómetros utilizando uma função adicional.
Isto porque, a GM sustenta que a arquitectura E-Flex tem a vantagem de suportar diferentes fontes de fornecimento de electricidade, desde baterias clássicas ou pilha de combustível até energias como a solar e eólica, além de biocombustíveis, gás natural e outros.
MAIS INFORMAÇÃO AQUI.

Will you please reduce CO2 emissions?


Bad news for everyone. The recently published 2006 World Energy Outlook report by the International Energy Agency (http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/2006.asp) estimates that world carbon dioxide emissions will keep on growing for the next few decades. China will be the country with the highest growth of CO2 emissions in the next decades, even surpassing the United States as the world largest emitter this year or in 2008. It is a fact that China will still have a relatively low per capita CO2 emission when compared with that of the United States. But with a fast-growing economy and a consuming market equivalent to 1/5 of world population depending on huge quantities of coal and oil to feed its industry and transportation, it is disturbing to hear that the Chinese government will likely continue rejecting binding caps on carbon emissions until the mid of the century on grounds that it is still a developing country.
If highly polluting countries such as China, the United States, Russia, India, Brazil among other do not make enough efforts in tackling carbon dioxide discharges to the atmosphere, will Kyoto Protocol caps make any substantial difference to the global warming problem?